The Unholy Durand Line, Buffering the Buffer
Dr. G. Rauf Roashan
August 11, 2001
Abstract: The British signed a document with the person of King Abdul Rahman Khan in 1893 referring to the borders between Afghanistan and British India. The line devised by the British was worked by the British Colonial Officer Durand and thus became known as the Durand Line. The document was to be ratified by the legislative body in Afghanistan. It never happened. It was to remain in force for one hundred years. It has not been revived on the deadline, which was 1993 either. Pakistan and now especially its military government is trying disparately to pressure Taleban into what Pakistani interior minister Moinuddin Haider calls revival of the sanctification of the Durand Line. Legally the Durand Line remains as an imaginary line dividing families on both sides. It has never been demarcated either, especially from Khyber Agency north to Chitral. This artificial and imaginary line is increasingly becoming an area of conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan even with Taleban regime that ironically has the political and military support of the government of Pakistan. A recent visit by an armed convoy of Taleban officials to Mohmand Agency has touched many nerves in Pakistan and has left it in shock. Friday Times of Pakistan reported the incident.
Pakistan seems to be possessed with its insistence on what its interior
minister Moinuddin Haider has called the need for sanctification of the Durand
Line. This column has dealt with the historical perspective of the Durand Line
in its earlier commentaries. (Refer to the commentary: Sanctity of the Unholy in
this column's archives.) The same minister had traveled a few times into
Afghanistan for talks with Taleban on the same issue. He has been reported
pressing hard for recognition of this “imaginary line” by Taleban. Pakistani
military government had even staged situations of conflict in the border areas
in order to drive its point home for recognition of the border. Throughout,
notwithstanding their relations with Pakistan, Taleban have resisted the
pressure. Moinuddin Haider returned home from Afghanistan without any commitment
from Taleban on the issue and as a matter of fact on any issue of importance
including his government's request from Taleban not to destroy the historical
statues of Buddha in Bamiyan.
No legislative body in Afghanistan ever ratified the Durand Line agreement,
signed by the British with the person of King Abdul Rahman Khan in 1893, and
therefore as far as its legality is concerned it remains as a defunct historical
document showing colonial designs in the third world countries. The Line
was devised by the British to strengthen the status of Afghanistan as a buffer
between the British India and the expanding Russian empire desirous of reaching
the warm waters of the Indian Ocean and for that matter the rich colonial lands
of the subcontinent of India. But when the British left India in 1947 for good,
it should have returned Afghan territory at least including the area up to the
natural border, the River Indus to Afghanistan. Instead, still dreaming of
keeping its colonial interests alive in the subcontinent the British gave this
territory to Pakistan, thus creating a double buffer zone between the
expansionist Soviet Union and the Indian Ocean. This deprived Afghanistan of
direct access to the sea. But this was not the only objective, the
British-authored project of Durand Line wanted to achieve. It wanted to separate
the Pashtoonland by an imaginary line. It would divide not only the land, but
would separate families, fathers from sons and brothers from brothers.
However, last Friday, the Friday Times of Pakistan published a comprehensive
report on an important incident that challenges the very existence of the notion
of the Durand Line. It reported a visit by a high level group of 95 Taleban
including their interior minister in a convoy of heavily armed vehicles to
Mohmand Agency. The report says the visit “has revived Afghanistan's claim on
the area and left Islamabad shocked.” The report added TFT has learnt that the
delegation, which was accorded a warm welcome by local chieftains and returned
the same day whence it had come, visited a number of places in the agency, most
notably the Khapakh area, some 20 kilometers west of Ghalanai. It seems that the
visit had prompted the local assistant political agent Mutahar Zeb, to send
urgent reports to the Home and Tribal Affairs Department. But Pakistani
authorities have downplayed the significance of the visit stating that the group
was there to offer condolence to a bereaved family. Manzoor Ahmed, additional
secretary in the Department is reported to have said that the practice is normal
since Mohmands live on both sides of the Durand Line and share their grief and
happiness.
But this is exactly the point any political observer would make. If a tribe is
so cohesively entwined, how could any imaginary line divide it? But the Friday
Times report also deals with other aspects of the visit. It says: “However, he
(Ahmed) could not explain why it was important for the Taleban interior minister
to come to Mohmand Agency all the way from Kabul. According to one malik
(chieftain) of the Khoizai tribe, the Taliban expressed anger at the Mohmand
sub-tribes' urge to get Pakistani identity cards. "This is our land. We
will give you the (identity) cards," the malik quoted one Taliban
delegation member as saying at a tea party, attended among other chieftains by
Malik Fazal Manan, a former member of Pakistan's national assembly. During one
of the ceremonies, the delegation also hoisted the Taliban flag at Khapakh.”
It is worth mentioning that the visit had scared the Pakistani government so
much so that it went ahead and arrested two tribal chieftains namely Malik Abid
and Malik Naseem for interrogation and released them after 72 hours. The report
further states: “Kabul has refused to renew the Durand Line treaty since 1993
when it expired, " says an Afghanistan expert. One of the reasons Pakistan
faced problems with the Kabul rulers right from its inception was Kabul's claim
over the North West frontier Province." Kabul never accepted that line or
the fact that the NWFP is part of Pakistan. This was one of the main policy
planks used by Sardar Daoud's government when it tried to foment trouble by
Pukhtoon nationalists in the NWFP on the issue of greater Pukhtoonistan,"
says this expert.”
The Durand Line treaty worked by the British was singed in 1893 and was to stay
in force for one hundred years. Even if the treaty were ratified by a legal
legislative body in Afghanistan its validity would have been expired in 1993 and
there is no record of it ever having been revived. Pakistan heavily invested in
Taleban for many reasons one of which was what its interior minister calls the
sanctification of the Durand Line. However, it should be stated that
matters such acceptance or rejection of international borders legally are the
responsibility of legislative bodies within states and no executive officer can
take over this right. In this respect Taleban are justified in having not taken
any decision, as they are not legally qualified to do so. This extremely
important and vital issue should be dealt with utmost care and true national
representation. Even this imaginary line remains unmarked from Khyber Agency up
into Chitral. It has been so for that past one hundred and four years. It will
remain so for hundreds of years to come.
This is a testimony to the fact that no artificial line, not even those devised
by colonial powers, can and should separate masses of humanity that belong
together. 08/11/01