Afghanistan Revisited

By  Dr. G. Rauf Roashan

Abstract:  No doubt, recent events in Afghanistan, the reactionary and tyrannical rule of Taleban and the use of the country by Al-Qaeda organization for the training of terrorists required a revisit by the United States that had abandoned this country immediately after the Soviet invading and occupying forces were forced to retreat.  The visit has sweet and sour repercussions for the Afghans, but may have wonderful results for the US giant oil companies such as UNOCAL. Some political observers suggest a link between the choice of President Bush of Dr. Zalmay Khalilzad an Afghan born former UNOCAL advisor as special representative of the United States to Afghanistan, to the US desire to see the Turkmen pipeline project implemented. As for as Afghanistan is concerned, Khalilzad could be the best person for the job as he not only knows the country and its needs, but has had a part in the restructuring of the efforts for finding of a solution to the Afghan problem.  The revisit will also give political dividend to the US in that it would find a foothold and a friendly government in the hub of South Central Asia where important countries such as Iran, Pakistan, India, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Kirghizistan, and China are located.

Almost immediately after the expulsion of the Soviet invading and occupying forces from Afghanistan and the beginning of the end of not only the cold war but of the communist regime in the Soviet Union, the United Sates and the West withdrew their active political interest from Afghanistan.  There was no reward for the achievement of one of the free world’s objectives, namely the toppling down of the communist system in Russia to the Afghan nation that made it all possible through their sacrifices. Even the strategic importance of this land was ignored as and when the Soviet threat of expansion in the region was removed.  Political observers who knew Afghanistan well did much to elaborate on the continued strategic importance of this country.  They warned the world that while the geopolitical position of Afghanistan was now changed and there was little military interest for it to be used against the United States military rival in the region, other issues such as narcotics and terrorism kept this country’s strategic importance alive.  But notwithstanding these warnings, the United States seemed to have ignored Afghanistan.

But events in Afghanistan started to create concern to the international community.  Opium started to be used as one of the main sources of financing of factional war by warlords in their war for power.  The imported Arab fighters who were brought in with full cognizance of both the CIA and the Pakistani Inter-service Intelligence colluded first with the so-called Mujahideen governments and later with Taleban, another creation of the Pakistani ISI.  They began establishing and operating of military training facilities for groups that later became known as extremists and terrorists.  Even then, the West evaded any active role in helping the Afghan nation rid itself of the aforementioned scourges. 

But then, a positive outcome of the end of the cold war, namely freedom of the former Central Asian Soviet Republics and especially the oil and gas rich Turkmenistan attracted the attention of the US capitalistic corporations.  The idea of exporting of Turkmen Oil from Daulatabad oil fields in southeastern Turkmenistan via Afghanistan to Pakistan and on to India came about and huge corporations such as the UNOCAL started negotiating joint investment for the extension of the 2 billion-Dollar pipeline with a 48 inch diameter through western Afghanistan to Pakistan.  To materialize this profitable project, economically worthwhile for all concerned, negotiations took place between UNOCAL and the Taleban administration.  Even a Taleban team was invited to visit the US and conduct negotiations on the extension of the pipeline. This column carried a commentary on the event on that time.

Zalmay Khalilzad, special adviser to President Bush who has just been named special envoy of the United States to Afghanistan and who had served as adviser to UNOCAL favored recognition of Taleban most probably in a bid to get their agreement and guarantees for the pipeline project.  However, he had to shift his policy soon after the missile attack on Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan ordered by President Clinton.  Soon after that attack UNOCAL too, shelved the project.  But a project of the economic dimensions of the vast oil fields of Turkmenistan could not remain shelved forever. Some observers have noted that Dr. Khalilzad’s appointment shows the interest of the Bush administration in the project of the pipeline and thus his choice of this former adviser to UNOCAl. 

Terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 on New York and Washington, DC triggered new interest in Afghanistan.  Suddenly this country had to be revisited, militarily and otherwise.

This visit however has had sweet and sour repercussions to the Afghan nation.  The new interest by the United States in Afghanistan resulted in the toppling down of the tyrannical regime of Taleban and ridding Afghanistan from their ignorant and reactionary rule. It provided Afghans a chance to work out a mechanism for choosing of a government of their own choice.  How this mechanism would work is still a big question, but there is no question about the opportunity that is provided the Afghan nation to take measured steps for reorganizing and repairing of their political and economic infrastructure.  How will they come out of the historical test is any ones guess. But a ray of hope has been provided for the future of the country.

On the other hand, bombardment of terrorist training camps and Taleban and Al-Qaeda bases has had many thousands of collateral casualties including physical destruction.  Continuation of the air attacks on Afghanistan, which was initially supported by many international circles, is slowly giving rise to an erosion of the support.  Only last week, first the Vice President of South Africa and later the former president of that country and the noble peace prize winner Nelson Mandela that enjoys worldwide trust expressed concern over bombing of Afghan targets.  Nelson Mandela had earlier expressed unconditional support to President Bush on his military action in Afghanistan.

But the revisiting of this country has had wonderful rewards for the United States.  A foothold in Central South Asia, in the middle of a politically and economically interesting region is an advantage the United States would draw as a result of its revisiting of Afghanistan.  Afghanistan is the center of an extremely important region that includes important countries such as Iran, Pakistan, India, China, and the newly independent former Soviet Republics of Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan.  A friendly Afghanistan would be a great asset to the United States in this important region.

Afghanistan will also be important because there is a need for controlling its capacity to produce opium. This objective could be achieved more easily with a friendly government in place.  Once the terrorist networks are demolished in Afghanistan, and an economically feasible country is put on track, Afghanistan could enjoy once again its international importance and could serve as a hub of international trade, commerce and communication.  Its own natural resources could be tapped to benefit the country itself and the region as a whole.  It could serve as a better friend to the US than Iran.  It could be used to balance relations with India and Pakistan.  It could also be used to monitor regional political interests of China.  It could once again be referred to as a country on the crossroads of civilizations and a conduit of commerce and a link between the vast countries of Central Asia and the sub-continent of India.  Its airports could provide shortened routes to international aviation. And the beauty of its rugged terrain, high rocky mountains and deep gorges with fast running rivers and streams and a variety of climates could re-attract world tourists rather than terrorists. 1/4/02


The views expressed in the contributed papers are that of the writer (s) and are not necessarily shared by the Institute for Afghan  Studies (IAS). In addition the IAS can take no responsibility for the quality and content of contributed material and external links.  Please review our Privacy Statement.
www.institute-for-afghan-studies.org
To contact us, send us an email at: info@institute-for-afghan-studies.org
Copyright Protected 2001